| ... From Page 17 |
| Presence of Opening Work-in-Progress only | |
|
The closing work-in-progress of a period becomes the opening work-in-progress for the subsequent period.
• Statement of Equivalent Production not needed
We need to think of preparing the statement of equivalent production and thereby the statement of cost and statement of evaluation only when there is closing work in progress.
Where there is opening work-in-progress only and no closing work in progress no such statements need be prepared as the problem of valuing closing work in progress does not arise. Opening work in progress would be an additional input that enters into the production process apart from the other inputs that might be received from the previous process or entered directly in the current process. |
| Illustration » Problem | |
|
Consider the following cost data of an organisation relating to a process for the month of March 2007.
|
| Illustration » Solution : Process a/c | |
|
Working Notes » Hide/Show
Notes/Assumptions
|
| Presence of both Opening and Closing Work-in-Progress | |
|
The closing work-in-progress of a period becomes the opening work-in-progress for the subsequent period. In the subsequent period there may be closing work-in-progress at the end of the period. In such situations we come across both opening and closing work-in-progress inventories during the same period.
• Statement of Equivalent Production is needed
We need to think of preparing the statement of equivalent production and thereby the statement of cost and statement of evaluation only when there is closing work in progress.
Thus, in this situation where there are both opening and closing work-in-progress inventories we need to prepare the above statements. Opening work in progress would be an additional input that enters into the production process apart from the other inputs that might be received from the previous process or entered directly in the current process. • Method of Valuation to be decided upon
Where there is opening work-in-progress and we are required to find the value of closing work-in-progress we need to decide upon whether or not to include/consider the previous period costs for the purpose of finding the cost per completed unit.
The two methods for valuation are » FIFO Method
Where we exclude the previous period costs and consider only the current period costs to be a part of the total cost of an element for finding the cost per completed unit in the "Statement of Cost" we are said to be adopting the "FIFO Method".
This is so called because we assume that the opening work-in-progress units are completed separately without being mixed with the input that has been introduced into the process during the current period. The work-in-progress units are assumed to be processed and completed first and then only the other units dealt with (First in First Out). To facilitate this, in the Statement of Equivalent Production, the output is segregated into two as
» Weighted Average Method
Where we include the previous period costs in the total cost of an element at the time of finding the cost per completed unit in the "Statement of Cost" we are said to be following the "Average Method" or the "Weighted Average Method"
This is so called because the cost per unit is arrived at by considering a cost which includes both the previous period costs as well as current period costs. In preparing the statement of equivalent production the total output is considered as a unit and no segregation is made between the opening work in progress completed and the units started and completed in the current period. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Illustration » Problem | |
|
Consider the following data relating to a process for the month of March 2007.
|
| Illustration » Working Notes | |
Closing work-in-progress = 2,400 units
|
| FIFO Method | |
• Statement of Equivalent Production
The Equivalent production statement relating to the data in the above illustration would be:
Production Started and Completed in the current period
» Opening Work-in-Progress Completed : % Completion
The % completion is indicative of the proportion of expenditure (compared to a complete unit) incurred on the units during the current period.
The % completion given within the problem data indicates the proportion of expenditure that has been incurred in the previous period. The remaining proportion indicates the proportion of expenditure on the opening work-in-progress units incurred in the current period. Therefore the %'s to be taken in the Equivalent production statement with regard to opening w-i-p units would be
» Others : % Completion
On units where production is started and completed in the current period, they are 100% complete with regard to all elements of cost.
With regard to closing work-in-progress, the units would be that much % complete as is indicated in the problem. » Essential Data
To be able to work out this statement the most essential data is the detail relating to the % completion of the opening work in progress.
In the absence of this data, we cannot adopt FIFO method. • Statement of Cost
The costs incurred in the current period are available from the cost data in the problem and the equivalent units from the statement of equivalent production. • Statement of Evaluation
The equivalent units data pertaining to each component is obtained from the statement of equivalent production and the cost per unit from the statement of cost. To obtain the cost of output the value of opening work in progress is included in the statement of evaluation. Cross Check
The total cost in the statement of evaluation excluding the value of opening work in progress should be equal to the total cost of all the elements together in the statement of cost.
Since the value of opening work in progress is also included in the statement, the total cost shows a figure that would be in excess of the total cost from the statement of cost. • Process Account
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Weighted Average Method | |
• Statement of Equivalent Production
The Equivalent production statement relating to the data in the above illustration would be:
» % Completion
The value of opening work in progress is mixed up with the cost incurred in the current period, thereby eliminating the influence of the fact that some of the expenses on the opening work in progress have been incurred in the previous period.
For the purpose of this statement, all production is of the same kind, started and completed in the current period itself. Thereby, they are 100% complete with regard to all elements of cost. The % completion data relating to closing work in progress is ascertained from the problem data. • Statement of Cost
» Essential Data
To be able to work out this statement the most essential data is the detail relating to the element wise distribution of the value of opening work in progress.
In the absence of this data, we cannot adopt AVERAGE method. • Statement of Evaluation
» Cross Check
The total cost in this statement should work out to the total cost as revealed by the statement of cost.
Where the cost per unit is obtained as an approximate decimal value, you may be required to make minor adjustments to ensure the same. Such an adjustment has to be inevitably made. Otherwise the process account would not balance. • Process Account
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| What method to use? What's the difference? | |
|
The ability to use a particular method is restricted by the availability of information in the problem.
Where both these informations are available as in the case of the illustration shown above, you may be required to use the method that is specifically indicated. In the absence of specific instruction and where the data is available, we can choose the method to be used. The Difference
Apart from the difference in the workings of the two methods, the difference would lie in the values arrived at.
The ultimate difference would be in the value of the various components which are evaluated in the statement of evaluation. These are the values that are present on the credit side of the process account. Considering the illustration worked out above, you can notice differences in these:
|
| Author Credit : The Edifier | ... Continued Page 19 |









