| ... From Page L:8 |
| A Problem | |
|
200 hrs of Skilled Labour/Labor @ Rs. 20 per hr, 400 hrs of Semi-Skilled Labour/Labor @ Rs. 15/hr and 150 hrs of Unskilled Labour/Labor @ Rs. 10 per hr were planned to be utlised for manufacturing 7,500 units of a product.
240 hrs of skilled labour/labor @ Rs. 22 per hr, 500 hrs of Semi-skilled labour/labor @ Rs. 14/hr and 220 hrs of Unskilled labour/labor @ Rs. 12 per hr were actually used for manufacturing 7,125 units of the product.
16 hrs of Skilled Labour/Labor time, 50 hrs of Semi-Skilled Labour/Labor time and 22 hrs of Unskilled Labour/Labor time were lost due to break down which is abnormal.
The problem data arranged in a working table:
What is the variation in total cost on account of time lost on account fo abnormal reasons i.e. abnormal idle time?
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Formulae » Labour/Labor Idle Time Variance (LITV) | |
|
That part of the Labour/Labor cost variance which arises on account of abnormal loss of labour/labor working time is identified as Labour/Labor Idle Time variance.
It's values is equal to the "Standard Cost of Abnormal Idle Time"
|
| LITV Formula interpretation | |
|
The above formulae for Labour/Labor Idle Time Variance can be used in all cases i.e. when AO = SO, AO ≠ SO, STMix = ATMix and STMix ≠ ATMix. Standard Rate present in the formula is unaffected by standard recalculation. Standard Time which changes on recalculating standards is not found in the formula.
LEV/LUV(G) vs. LEV/LUV(N)In measuring the efficiency of labour/labor employed, we need to think in terms of the output that has been achieved in the time they have worked (if they are working under standard conditions).If the time they worked for includes time that has been lost on account of abnormal reasons like breakdown of machinery, power shut down, natural calamities, etc., it would not be possible to measure their efficiency accurately. The labourers/laborers can be held responsible for inefficiency, if efficiency is measured taking the actual productive time only. |
| Recalculating Standards does not effect LITV Calculations | |
|
Since standard time is not used in this calculation, the formula would be the same for all conditions i.e. when AO = SO or when AO ≠ SO as well as when ST(SM) = AT(AM) or when ST(SM) ≠ AT(AM).
AO ≠ SO and ST(SM) ≠ AT(AM)
AO = SO
STMix = ATMix
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Solution [in all cases] | |
|
Using, LITV = − (AT(A) × SR)
Labour/Labor Idle Time Variance due to labour/labor types who are
|
| Formulae using Inter-relationships among Variances | |
Where there is abnormal loss timeSince LCV = LRPV + LUV/LEV + LITV
VerificationThe interrelationships between variances can also be used to verify the correctness of the answeres we derive through our calculationsWe know LCV = LRPV + LUV + LITV.
|
| Who is held responsible for the Variance? | |
|
Since this variance is on account of abnormal reasons, the responsibility for it can be attributed to some department or person in-charge only after knowing the reasons for the abnormal loss of time.
Say, if the reason for the laborers/labourers sitting idle is breakdown of machinery, then the person who is to keep the machinery in shape by conducting regular maintenance check would be responsible for this loss. Alternatively, when there is a power failure on account of a natural calamity, no one can be blamed, but the organisation has to take note of the variance so that it can get itself prepared to face such a possibility in the future. |
| Author Credit : The Edifier | ... Continued Page L:10 |









